mutual fund capital gains tax

If you own stock mutual funds outside of your 401k or IRA,  chances are you got stuck with owing tax on an investment that actually went down in value in 2018!

It’s not what you make, but what you keep that counts. Below is an article from Russell Investments that does a very nice job of explaining this tax kick in the pants. Of course, our clients are set up to minimize these taxes through tax managed accounts and using Exchange Traded funds (ETF’s).

5 Powerful Reasons to Invest in ETF’s

Ouch!

Yet, this is exactly what many investors are feeling right now – it’s the effect of 2018 and the pain keeps coming.  And to top it off, right in the middle of spring comes everyone’s favorite day of the year – April 15th!!

Here is the pain I am talking about.  Summed up into three of the most important numbers coming out of 2018.

Have you seen these three numbers talked about by any other Investment Strategist this year?  Probably not.

What are these numbers; what do they represent:

…of all US Equity Funds in 2018 had a negative return.1 91%.  It was not a good year for equity returns, and I don’t have to state the obvious that many investors were not happy when they opened their statements at the start of the year.  This is the wound.

…of all US Equity Funds in 2018 had a capital gain distribution.2 86%.  Many people are asking “What… How? Why?”.  Not only was it not a good year for equity returns, most Funds made distributions that investors are now needing to pay taxes on.  This is the salt in the wound.

…was the average capital gain distribution from US Equity Funds in 2018.311%.  11%! This is the largest gain distribution we saw in almost three decades, and it came in a year where most clients experienced negative equity returns.  This is not only what investors didn’t expect to see coming out of 2018, for most this is the last thing they expected to see.  This is the salt being rubbed hard into the wound.

These are important numbers to be aware of and key ones to understand as well as share with both clients and prospects.  While these are the averages when it comes to mutual funds in 2018, there is reason to believe we can see more of this in years to come.  This is why it’s important to think about the tax implications of the investment strategies within client portfolios.  If this is not front of mind for the design, construction, and management of taxable non-qualified accounts, we believe it should be going forward.

The bottom line

Being smart about taxes only gets you part of the way there – that’s the easy stuff like using IRAs, 401ks, 403bs, etc.  Being tax-managed is critical in thinking about how to place investment portfolios on better footing from an after-tax standpoint.  Without tax management being front of mind and central in the management of a non-qualified account, the cost as it relates to taxes can be significant. We believe you should make this a front of mind and central part of your investment and planning proposition.

Investors are likely looking at their portfolios and trying to determine how the volatile fourth quarter impacted their returns and how it impacted progress toward their financial goals. Having the market (Russell 3000® Index) pull back -14% in a single quarter and drop -5% for the year is tough, but for taxable investors, the possible tax hit will add insult to injury.

Chart of taxable distribution

Morningstar U.S. OE Mutual Funds and ETFs. % = Calendar Year Cap Gain Distributions / Year-End NAV. For years 2001 through 2013, used oldest share class. 2014 forward includes all share classes. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.

 

How can there be a tax owed when an investment goes down?

Mutual funds are required to payout 98.2% of realized capital gains back to shareholders within their fiscal year. If the mutual fund has unused losses from prior years (capital loss carryforwards), it may be able to offset some – or all – of the gain depending on size of the loss carryforward. Given that U.S. stock markets had positive returns for nine consecutive years coming out of 2008 plus the first three quarters of 2018, hardly any U.S. equity funds had any available losses to use against recognized gains.

Additionally, 2018 was a record year for selling pressure on U.S. equity funds, as investors expressed concerns about high valuations and/or moves to passive investing.This selling pressure caused many portfolio managers to sell securities that had low cost basis. Again, U.S. stocks were up cumulatively 340% from January 2009 – December 2018.1 Odds are they had to sell low basis securities that triggered gains.

The pullback during the fourth quarter, where stocks were down -14%, pushed 2018 to have a calendar year return of -5%. So, the aforementioned selling pressure happened in a year when equity markets were down.

When we looked broadly across all products within the Morningstar U.S. equity universes (large, small, mid, active, passive, ETF’s, etc.), 86% of the products paid a capital gain distribution for 2018. 2 This is up from 2017, when the number of funds with a distribution was 65%.3

And for those that paid the capital gain distribution, the average payout was 11% of net asset value of the fund. Think about that. Equity markets were down -5% for the year and taxable investors will be receiving an average distribution of 11% on the value of their investments. Being an average, that means there were many with amounts much higher and lower than the average. Definitely a time when being above average was not optimal. And this 11% distribution amount is the highest number we’ve seen since we’ve been tracking back to 2001.

Note also that – on average – 16% of the capital gain distribution was characterized as short-term capital gain. Why does this matter? Short-term capital gains are taxed as ordinary income and can have materially higher tax rates than long-term capital gains – depending on one’s tax bracket.

The math of taxes: up year vs. down year

In 2017, the markets were much kinder to investors and the tax hit maybe did not feel as punitive. The average distribution was 8% and U.S. stocks were up 21%. Many investors are (incorrectly) less bothered paying a tax when markets are up, because they feel like they made money. The exhibit below shows the math for taxable investors comparing 2017 to 2018.

Chart of tax drag
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. As of 12/31/2018. Calculation methodology: Assumed starting hypothetical portfolio value of $100,000. U.S. equity market return applied to starting value to arrive at ending pre-tax value. Percent lost to taxes is the estimated taxes due divided by $100k. This amount is then subtracted from the ending pre-tax value shown to arrive at final after-tax value.
Sources: U.S. equity market return: Russell 3000® Index. Index returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.
Average U.S. Equity Fund Distribution: Capital Gains/Share (% of NAV) based on Morningstar U.S. OE Mutual Funds and ETFs. % = Calendar Year Cap Gain Distributions / Year-End NAV. Distribution is assumed to be made at last day of year and reinvested. Tax rate is 23.8% (Max LT Cap Gain 20% + Net Investment Income 3.8%)
.

You can see that regardless of the market backdrop, the hypothetical portfolio paid around $2,300 in federal taxes.Again, these are averages (meaning some paid more) and the math also assumes the gains are taxed as long term capital gains.As previously stated, parts of these distributions were short term in nature and would lead to higher tax bills than the amount shown.

The power of being a tax-smart investor is looking to dial down the tax drag every year – regardless of market return.Dialing down the tax hit in a year like 2017 leaves more money in the account to grow the following years and unleash the power of compounding over time.That is the real power of tax-smart investing.

What can you do?

The first thing is for investors to connect the dots between the IRS Form 1099 they receive in January to the investment return one sees on their investment report.Connect the dots for your clients. Even if you reinvest the distribution, it can be taxable. The amount on the 1099 is reducing your investment return.

Next is to focus on tax-smart investment approaches. Tax-managed equity funds are designed to be managed to limit the amount of taxable distributions and work to not sacrifice any investment return. Tax-managed equity funds can look to harvest losses opportunistically throughout the year to create a cushion to be used against future losses.  The pullback markets saw in Q4 2018 afforded this opportunity for tax-managed equity funds.

Tax-managed equity funds levers include:

  • Active loss harvesting – all year and not just year end

  • Manage holding periods: Avoiding/limiting short-term capital gains

  • Sources of return: dividends vs. capital appreciation

  • Specific tax lot identification for buys/sells

  • Tax-smart manager changes to limit tax impact

The bottom line

2018 market results, coupled with larger-than-average capital gain distributions, are coming together to create the (im)perfect storm for advisor discussions in Q1 2019.  Advisors need to be ready to explain to their taxable investors why the tax hit when investors also saw negative returns. Will Rogers is attributed with saying, “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.” If your taxable clients are in tax-inefficient investments, the first thing to stop is making it worse. Don’t reinvest the distribution back into the same tax-inefficient investment and evaluate making the choice to switch to a tax-smart investing approach.

Take a look at your tax return or your 1099 under capital gains and decide if it’s time to review your tax planning.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *